Well, the Academy of Motion Picture
Arts and Sciences voters—i.e. the people who hand out those tiny little golden
men everyone seems to be talking about today—have had their say. Here is my
response.
Intro
I love movies. I have loved movies all my life. I grew up on them. When I was eight years old, I managed to convince myself I would make movies when I grew up. Now I am in the process of getting a degree in Film Studies. I write about film more than ever before, partly because I have to for my classes, mostly because I enjoy it, because I have something to write about. Sometimes it helps me understand the film better; sometimes it helps me understand myself better.I created this blog as a place to showcase my work, and also as an incentive to keep writing reviews, analyses, and essays over breaks, when there’s no one here to grade me.I have tried many times, and failed, to explain in a coherent manner why it is that I love films. Here is my best—and most coherent—guess.
Thursday, January 16, 2014
Tuesday, January 14, 2014
Saving Mr. Banks (2013)
Richly rendered, intoxicating and ingenious, Saving Mr. Banks is at times no less fantastical than stories about
governesses who can fly. Director John Lee Hancock of The Blind Side fame, writers Kelly Marcel and Sue Smith, and the
superb ensemble of seasoned actors create a
riveting backstage account of artistic collaboration, a clash of Hollywood titans
marbled with moments of high comedy. The Walt-worthy giddiness, depth of
feeling, and the stunning performances elevate the story above its premise as
an unapologetically retro valentine to the studio that is the most literal
Hollywood dream factory.
Thick with affection and old-fashioned showmanship, the movie is a Disney
fairytale based on fact, namely the making of Mary Poppins, the much beloved 1964 musical fantasy that put Walt
and his boys on the map as serious creators of live action family entertainment.
There are knowing winks to Disney’s flying nanny, but Saving Mr. Banks is accessible and enjoyable to even those entirely
innocent to the original film—if such people exist.
Monday, January 6, 2014
Inside Llewyn Davis (2013)
Subtle and surreptitiously
soulful, Joel
and Ethan Coen’s latest has a light, tender touch and a surfeit of sincere,
deep feeling, two things the Coen brothers generally lack. A lot of the emotion
comes from the music itself, supervised by T. Bone Burnett, a man who really knows
his way around a ballad. The film is as melancholy as the somber, smoky, sweet
songs filled with steely, blue notes, providing a startlingly straight-faced
departure for the directing/writing/producing/editing duo behind Fargo, No Country for Old Men, The
Big Lebowski, Burn After Reading, and Raising Arizona. Marvelous and mordantly
funny, Inside Llewyn Davis is deeply
personal, boldly original, and highly emotional.
The sounds
of the early sixties folk music revival float in the air like a strange,
intoxicating perfume, reflecting the lonesomeness and romance of the traveling
life, particularly the meandering, fraught journey of a guitar-strumming balladeer
trying to reconcile his life and his art. Oscar Isaac, who
portrays the title character with sincere conviction and a haunting humanism, can
definitely sing, in a fine, clear tenor voice that palpitates with the poignant
pain of loss, longing, and loneliness. All of the songs speak to this pain and to
the rootlessness and regret of his existence: “Fare Thee Well,” “Five Hundred Miles (Away From
Home),” and especially “Hang
Me, Oh Hang Me,” which opens the film: “wouldn’t mind the hangin’ except
for layin’ in the grave so long, poor boy... I been all around this world.” The
words and chords don’t just enrich the movie, they complete it, tapping into reservoirs
of otherwise inaccessible feelings.
Thursday, January 2, 2014
The Wolf of Wall Street (2013)
The Wolf of Wall Street starts with an ad for Stratton Oakmont; the commercial makes us believe the brokerage firm is a golden American institution, a rock of financial stability, as traditional, trustworthy, and established as if the Mayflower passengers had etched the very name into Plymouth Rock. Cut to the nightmarish circus of a rollicking party on the trading floor of the company—not unlike what we’ve imagined went on in Rome before the fall (all but the roller-skating chimp and snorting coke off hookers, of course)—and then freeze-frame on the billionaire brokers tossing a dwarf at a huge velcro target, literally and figuratively abusing the Little Guy. Stratton Oakmont is America, its founder proudly proclaims in the ad. How horrifying is it to realize that he just might be right?
After going unexpectedly family-friendly with 2011’s Hugo,
Martin Scorsese pulls a dramatic 180 with The
Wolf of Wall Street, a nonstop barrage of drug-fueled decadence adapted by Terence Winter from
real-life
stockbroking swindler Jordan
Belfort’s memoir. The book is a distant relative of the truth,
it’s been said, and the film is a distant relative of the book. A big, unruly
bacchanal with a sizeable, sinister smile on its lips, the movie is a bit of a
contradiction, both abashed and
unashamed, spectacle and cautionary
tale, ode to and indictment of
dollars, depravity, and conspicuous consumption.
Disturbing and exciting, exhilarating and exhausting, the endlessly
entertaining film holds together by sheer virtue of its exuberant, furious
filmmaking energy. Scorsese might be the best cinematic connoisseur of
charismatic sociopaths, and Henry
Hill or Nicky Santoro
ain’t got nothing on Belfort. The Wolf of
Wall Street’s brokers are avatars of an age of heedless self-indulgence and
greed, gangsters with fountain pens instead of guns, slicing and dicing your
bank account and putting your savings in a vise rather than your head. And,
just like in the much less cynical and coked-up American
Hustle, you’ll cheer the con artists on and thank them for swindling
you when they’re done.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






