Some critics have called Alan J. Pakula’s neo-noir Klute (1971) progressive and radical in its positive depiction of
an independent, sexually liberated woman; others have argued that the construction
of the female character is no different than that found in classic noir, and
that Klute actually operates in a
profoundly anti-feminist way. This essay seeks to explore the reasons behind these
diverging interpretations, locating the source of the difficulty in assessing the
main female character’s power over the narrative in the disjunctive
relationship between sound and image in the film. In marked contrast to the
classic noir cycle, in Klute the
story is filtered through the subjectivity of the female character, who poses a
distinctive challenge to the patriarchal order and the foundation of the
heterosexual couple. At the same time, there is a disconnect between the words
she speaks in voiceover and the actions we see unfold onscreen that actively
works to undermine her point of view. It becomes increasingly difficult, then,
to say with any certainty whether the film’s central female protagonist can be
considered an active subject or a passive object presented for the male gaze.
Intro
I love movies. I have loved movies all my life. I grew up on them. When I was eight years old, I managed to convince myself I would make movies when I grew up. Now I am in the process of getting a degree in Film Studies. I write about film more than ever before, partly because I have to for my classes, mostly because I enjoy it, because I have something to write about. Sometimes it helps me understand the film better; sometimes it helps me understand myself better.I created this blog as a place to showcase my work, and also as an incentive to keep writing reviews, analyses, and essays over breaks, when there’s no one here to grade me.I have tried many times, and failed, to explain in a coherent manner why it is that I love films. Here is my best—and most coherent—guess.
Showing posts with label Style. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Style. Show all posts
Thursday, April 30, 2015
Wednesday, March 25, 2015
High School Confidential
Roger Ebert opens his review of Rian Johnson’s debut feature Brick (2005) with the following quote from Elaine May’s A New Leaf: “You have preserved in your own lifetime, sir, a way of life that was dead before you were born.” The line is more than appropriate, considering Brick is, in a surprisingly straightfaced manner, carrying on in its own lifetime a style of film that was dead long before it was born. At the same time, the depth of feeling and sincerity that runs through the film makes it seem utterly, breathlessly alive. In part nostalgic for a time and a style long passed, in part playing with and updating the conventions of the classic noir, Johnson’s film transposes the snaking plots and sneaky moods of gritty detective fiction to a contemporary high school—90210 goes noir, or what we would imagine a David Lynch or Coen brothers reimagining of Heathers might look like.
The movie, which hums with
constant menace and sparks with hipster slang, was awarded the Sundance Film Festival’s Special Jury Prize for Originality of Vision in 2005—and,
whether or not you can take its premise seriously, there is no denying it is a
work of originality and vision. Brick
is an intriguing experiment in determination that unashamedly demands your
attention, “one of those movies than seems not made but born—a small
masterpiece that’s perfectly strange and strangely perfect” (Patterson). The combination is surprising, but what is
even more surprising is the extent to which it works. The question begs to be
raised, why is the Hammet-Chandler school so readily compatible with actual
school?
Thursday, July 10, 2014
Only Lovers Left Alive (2013)
Tilda Swinton and Tom Hiddleston make the perfect pair of ivory-skinned
wraiths in maverick
moviemaker Jim
Jarmusch’s Only Lovers Left Alive.
These fabulously aloof, effortlessly stylish creatures are the coolest people
you could imagine. They were hipsters before it was cool to be a hipster—a few
centuries before, actually. In the
film’s hypnotic opening sequence
a spinning 45-rpm record fills the screen, and Wanda Jackson’s witchy, bewitching
wail fills your soul. The image dissolves into a revolving bird’s eye view of
two silent, still figures, she surrounded by countless stacks of books strewn
across the floor, he reclined in a couch amid vintage guitars and vinyl
records, miles apart yet seemingly in the same room. Round and round they go,
the camera circling closer and closer, inviting you to follow down the rabbit
hole of this dark, delirious, delicious film. These bloodsuckers might be after
your hemoglobin, but their story and style will start seeping into your veins
as early as that first shot. Jarmusch’s undead really know how to live.
Tuesday, April 8, 2014
sex, lies, and videotape (1989) Analysis
Few
movie titles have been as literal as Sex,
Lies, and Videotape, writer/director Steven
Soderbergh’s tour-de-force debut feature. And although the first word of
the title makes a promise that a more conventional, Hollywood film would
deliver on, Soderbergh’s very personal, wry, and grown-up comedy of sexual
manners is all talk and almost no action, at least not onscreen, where all we
get is white static. Sex, like everything else in the lives of its four
protagonists, is treated in an adult and intellectual manner. Filmed in real
settings, on a shoestring budget in the director’s hometown of Baton Rouge,
with a cast of mostly unknown young actors and focusing on controversial
subject matter, the movie was an overnight sensation when it was screened at Sundance, later going on to win
the grand prize at Cannes. Just like James
Spader’s Graham, an outsider who rides into town in a ’69 Cutlass,
challenging the dysfunctionality of the American Dream through his very being, Soderbergh
provides a new, alternative view of what American cinema is and what it could
be. The ‘independence’ of Sex, Lies, and
Videotape, its uniqueness, lies in both its content and form, if more
pronounced in the former.
Sunday, December 22, 2013
Dark Streets, Dangerous Women and Knights in Dirty Armor: Frank Miller’s “Sin City” and the Conventions of Noir
“The air cools. The sounds change. The suits and brief-cases scurry to their fortresses and bolt their doors and balance their checkbooks and ignore the screams and try not to think about who really owns Sin City.”
—Sin
City Volume I: The Hard Goodbye
Sin
City, its creator has said, is not a place but a state of mind (Booker 161). Eager
to do comic books about crime, “about tough guys in mean cities,” in 1991 artist
Frank Miller created the first story of the Sin
City series, initially released in thirteen parts in Dark Horse Presents (Harvey 259). The story was retitled The Hard Goodbye, released as a graphic novel and followed by five more “yarns,”
sordid tales of urban violence set in a climate of complete moral corruption. Influenced
by Hammett, Chandler, Spillane, Jim Thompson and “long nights of living alone
in Manhattan and discovering the black-and-white movies,” Miller’s
illustrations drew their inspiration from outside the traditional confines of
the comic book subculture (MacDonald 42, Gabillet 104). Sin City featured gritty
black-and-white stylized graphics, over-the-top, hard-case crime retro
dialogue, hardcore ultraviolence; it became an exercise in the celebration of
film noir culture, one that is particularly extreme, violent and brutal, even
by the genre’s standards. Steeped in darkness both physical and psychological,
the style, characters, setting, themes, and tone of the graphic novel series,
particularly the first four volumes (The
Hard Goodbye, A Dame to Kill For,
The Big Fat Kill and That Yellow Bastard) are undeniably
indebted to film noir. At the same time,
Sin City self-consciously draws
attention to the conventions of noir either by reducing or amplifying them,
effectively critiquing its own narrative forms while remaining entirely within
the rules of the genre.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





