Some critics have called Alan J. Pakula’s neo-noir Klute (1971) progressive and radical in its positive depiction of
an independent, sexually liberated woman; others have argued that the construction
of the female character is no different than that found in classic noir, and
that Klute actually operates in a
profoundly anti-feminist way. This essay seeks to explore the reasons behind these
diverging interpretations, locating the source of the difficulty in assessing the
main female character’s power over the narrative in the disjunctive
relationship between sound and image in the film. In marked contrast to the
classic noir cycle, in Klute the
story is filtered through the subjectivity of the female character, who poses a
distinctive challenge to the patriarchal order and the foundation of the
heterosexual couple. At the same time, there is a disconnect between the words
she speaks in voiceover and the actions we see unfold onscreen that actively
works to undermine her point of view. It becomes increasingly difficult, then,
to say with any certainty whether the film’s central female protagonist can be
considered an active subject or a passive object presented for the male gaze.
Intro
I love movies. I have loved movies all my life. I grew up on them. When I was eight years old, I managed to convince myself I would make movies when I grew up. Now I am in the process of getting a degree in Film Studies. I write about film more than ever before, partly because I have to for my classes, mostly because I enjoy it, because I have something to write about. Sometimes it helps me understand the film better; sometimes it helps me understand myself better.I created this blog as a place to showcase my work, and also as an incentive to keep writing reviews, analyses, and essays over breaks, when there’s no one here to grade me.I have tried many times, and failed, to explain in a coherent manner why it is that I love films. Here is my best—and most coherent—guess.
Showing posts with label femme fatale. Show all posts
Showing posts with label femme fatale. Show all posts
Thursday, April 30, 2015
Wednesday, March 25, 2015
High School Confidential
Roger Ebert opens his review of Rian Johnson’s debut feature Brick (2005) with the following quote from Elaine May’s A New Leaf: “You have preserved in your own lifetime, sir, a way of life that was dead before you were born.” The line is more than appropriate, considering Brick is, in a surprisingly straightfaced manner, carrying on in its own lifetime a style of film that was dead long before it was born. At the same time, the depth of feeling and sincerity that runs through the film makes it seem utterly, breathlessly alive. In part nostalgic for a time and a style long passed, in part playing with and updating the conventions of the classic noir, Johnson’s film transposes the snaking plots and sneaky moods of gritty detective fiction to a contemporary high school—90210 goes noir, or what we would imagine a David Lynch or Coen brothers reimagining of Heathers might look like.
The movie, which hums with
constant menace and sparks with hipster slang, was awarded the Sundance Film Festival’s Special Jury Prize for Originality of Vision in 2005—and,
whether or not you can take its premise seriously, there is no denying it is a
work of originality and vision. Brick
is an intriguing experiment in determination that unashamedly demands your
attention, “one of those movies than seems not made but born—a small
masterpiece that’s perfectly strange and strangely perfect” (Patterson). The combination is surprising, but what is
even more surprising is the extent to which it works. The question begs to be
raised, why is the Hammet-Chandler school so readily compatible with actual
school?
Sunday, December 22, 2013
Dark Streets, Dangerous Women and Knights in Dirty Armor: Frank Miller’s “Sin City” and the Conventions of Noir
“The air cools. The sounds change. The suits and brief-cases scurry to their fortresses and bolt their doors and balance their checkbooks and ignore the screams and try not to think about who really owns Sin City.”
—Sin
City Volume I: The Hard Goodbye
Sin
City, its creator has said, is not a place but a state of mind (Booker 161). Eager
to do comic books about crime, “about tough guys in mean cities,” in 1991 artist
Frank Miller created the first story of the Sin
City series, initially released in thirteen parts in Dark Horse Presents (Harvey 259). The story was retitled The Hard Goodbye, released as a graphic novel and followed by five more “yarns,”
sordid tales of urban violence set in a climate of complete moral corruption. Influenced
by Hammett, Chandler, Spillane, Jim Thompson and “long nights of living alone
in Manhattan and discovering the black-and-white movies,” Miller’s
illustrations drew their inspiration from outside the traditional confines of
the comic book subculture (MacDonald 42, Gabillet 104). Sin City featured gritty
black-and-white stylized graphics, over-the-top, hard-case crime retro
dialogue, hardcore ultraviolence; it became an exercise in the celebration of
film noir culture, one that is particularly extreme, violent and brutal, even
by the genre’s standards. Steeped in darkness both physical and psychological,
the style, characters, setting, themes, and tone of the graphic novel series,
particularly the first four volumes (The
Hard Goodbye, A Dame to Kill For,
The Big Fat Kill and That Yellow Bastard) are undeniably
indebted to film noir. At the same time,
Sin City self-consciously draws
attention to the conventions of noir either by reducing or amplifying them,
effectively critiquing its own narrative forms while remaining entirely within
the rules of the genre.
Friday, November 1, 2013
The Counselor (2013)
The Counselor, Cormac McCarthy’s much-anticipated screen-writing
debut paints an elusive, eccentric, exquisitely rendered picture of poetic
pain. Filled with bizarre, bone-grinding violence, twisted characters,
confusion and moral compromise, Ridley Scott’s movie becomes a sodden, sordid
cautionary tale of good and—mostly—evil. If you were looking forward to the
crime thriller—more Tony
than Ridley—the film’s trailer
seems bent on promoting, The Counselor
is not it.
Michael Fassbender heads a burning hot all-star cast, all outshined,
hover, by the pulpy, lyrical, hardboiled and hell-bound script, a foray into
the mesmerizing and merciless milieu of corrosive drug trade on the
American-Mexican border—a barrier as moral as it is geographical for much of
American fiction. McCarthy and Scott enter a closed, dangerous, elite world,
devoid of any ordinary people to act as gateways or guides for the audience or
to remind us of a reality beyond the brutal one of the cartel.
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Casablanca (1942) Analysis
The classic wartime romantic melodrama Casablanca has been tested by time and passes with flying colors. An accidental success of the studio system assembly line, it carries as much weight today, if not more, as it did in 1942. Its poignant and stirring love story is timeless and eternal. The rich and smoky atmosphere and chiaroscuro lighting, the lush black and white cinematography, and main themes of loss, honor, self-sacrifice and redemption in a chaotic world perfectly reflected the dark and pessimistic WWII social climate, and are still perfect seventy years later.
Rick Blaine’s (the unimitable Humphrey Bogart) tough,
cynical, and efficient exterior is an imperfect armor, barely covering the core
of sentiment and idealism. His ultimate sacrifice in the service of something
greater than himself is instantly appealing. He becomes a true romantic hero
worthy of the other characters’ and the audience’s admiration. The emotional
effect on viewers warming in the glow of Rick’s gallant heroism is the thought
that perhaps we too could achieve greatness through great sacrifice. The film’s
ending is not happy, but it is hopeful. True love does not conquer all. It
does, however, elevate its characters to higher levels of humanity. And this
stands at the core of Casablanca,
distinguishing it from the majority of noir films that chronicle the dark side
of human nature, basking in their own deep shadows of gloom and disenchantment.
The movie dares to rise above the dark atmosphere of the war years,
demonstrating that nobility and honor are still alive and well, and run a café
in the unoccupied French province
of Morocco.
***This is a short analysis of the film. It contains spoilers.
Thursday, May 30, 2013
Sex, Shadows, and Sin on Celluloid: The Femme Fatale and Silent Vamp as Threats to the Social Order
“The dark lady, the spider woman, the evil seductress who tempts man and brings about his destruction is among the oldest themes of art, literature, and mythology in Western culture. She is as old as Eve, and as current as today’s movies…” (Place 35). It is the movies that have given us some of the most memorable images of these women, modern Circes who trap men, use and ultimately destroy them. The beautiful and treacherous woman of classic film noir, the femme fatale, and the equally dangerous and deadly silent vamps are creations of threatened men’s imaginations; they are fantasies of destructive female sexuality as seen through male eyes, but they also become figures of female empowerment. They are strong, independent, self-serving and deceptive women removed from their “proper place” and submissive role in a patriarchal society, and thus challenge the social order. But while the silent film seductress, played most famously by Theda Bara, was a type, her cinematic descendant, the femme fatale, developed a fuller, sometimes ambivalent, more clearly drawn and individualistic personality. The women of films like The Maltese Falcon, The Big Sleep, Double Indemnity, The Postman Always Rings Twice or The Lady from Shanghai were not caricatures of male fear projected unto the collective consciousness of the screen like the vamps, but fully blown, empowered women.
Thursday, February 28, 2013
The Big Sleep (1946) Analysis

***Spoilers ahead (although I can't really give away the plot; like both the film's director and writer, I have no idea what the solution to the murders is)! This is an analysis of Vivian's character as a noir woman and her relationship with Bogart's Marlowe.
"I Can’t Remember to Forget You": The Nolan Brothers’ “Memento Mori” and Memento
Time is an absurdity. An abstraction. The only thing that matters is
this moment. This moment a million times over. You have to trust me. If this
moment is repeated enough, if you keep trying—and you have to keep
trying—eventually you will come across the next item on your list. – Jonathan
Nolan, “Memento Mori”
Jonathan Nolan’s short story “Memento Mori,”
published in Esquire in 2001, and Christopher Nolan’s Memento,
released in 2000, blend a black, jagged sense of humor with sobering thematic meditations
on time, memory, knowledge, and grief. Focusing on a man suffering from short
term memory loss, or anterograde amnesia, they present a character adrift in
space, time, and experience, whose life is a waking kaleidoscopic nightmare of
conflicting details, an endless repetition of first encounters and first
impressions. He describes it as waking up, experiencing the same confusion and
disorientation we all do when we get out of bed in the morning, but for him it
happens roughly every ten minutes. While “Memento Mori” is all internal,
capturing Earl’s setting, thoughts and actions without the introduction of any
other characters or dialogue, the movie Memento, an aggressively
nonlinear riddle tangled up in a dizzying, elegant spiral structure that moves
backwards, forwards, and sideways, sometimes at the same time, takes the basic idea of the story and
develops it into a feature length film, expanding and changing it to fit the
requirements of the medium while maintaining the same darkly comic tone and
general idea and backstory.
***This is a comparative essay and it contains spoilers.
***This is a comparative essay and it contains spoilers.
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Blonde Venus (1932) Analysis

Josef von Sternberg’s Blonde Venus, released in 1932, was decidedly of the pre-code sensibility. Starring the incomparable, irrepressible, incandescent Marlene Dietrich, a sex goddess of elusive and earthly beauty and sensuality, the film, already compromising in its family-upholding ending, would have been impossible to make only a year later. The title refers to main character Helen Faraday, a strong, independent, sexual and sexualized woman torn between her family and her career. The use of her stage name suggests the importance of her image, her façade, beneath which lies an enigma. Helen’s transformation throughout the movie is effortlessly expressed through the visuals; the shot selection, editing, lighting, costuming, and the position of the actors within the frame help reflect as well as create the changes in her role and identity. Helen’s choice is not between the two men in her life, but between her child and her independence, two sides of herself that stand in opposition, manifestations of her fundamental natures as mother and professional woman.
***This is an analysis, not a review, and it contains spoilers
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)