Trying to write a review of 22
Jump Street—which I’ve been putting off for as long as humanly possible—I
find myself at a loss. Not because I don’t have anything to say about this sly,
self-referencing movie, but because there doesn’t seem to be any need for it.
The film is critic-proof, reviewing itself as it goes along. It’s a buddy cop
movie about the conventions of buddy cop movies, a sequel about the appeal and
downside of sequels, a low expectation summer blockbuster about the low
expectations of all summer blockbusters. Basically, it wants to eat its genre
parody cake and have it too.
In the
first movie, the 2012 hit that borrowed its title and undercover brother
shtick from the old television
show best known for making every ’80s teenage girl in America and beyond fall in
love with Johnny
Depp, the Jump Street operation was restarted, Chief Hardy (Nick Offerman)
explains, because “The guys in charge of this stuff lack creativity and are
completely out of ideas.” That may have registered as a jab at the studio
powers that be, but in reality it’s a smiling affirmation that the guys in
charge know precisely what they’re doing.
Made by the creators of a series of self-aware blockbusters, including 21 Jump Street, Cloudy
with a Chance of Meatballs and this year’s The
Lego Movie, Phil
Lord and Christopher Miller’s latest is an exploding assemblage of gags,
pratfalls, winking asides, throwaway one-liners, and self-aware jokes. Some of
it feels so artificially, meta-humorously obligatory, aiming only to recreate
the original in detail, only bigger and more expensive. But there’s no need for
me to accuse the filmmakers of paint-by-numbers plotting; they make that case
for me. In the process, 22 Jump Street
successfully inoculates itself against criticism. It anticipates any objection
or observation you might make about it as a film and makes it first, with a
shrug and a grin. What almost saves it is that sometimes this commentary is
original and lively, even ecstatically silly.
The plot is basically a Xeroxed copy of the first film, the only
difference being that it swaps high school for college and prom for spring
break. After letting a wanted kingpin (Peter Stormare)
slip through their hands in the opening scene action setpiece—a hilarious
episode that builds to a great, Harold Lloyd-worthy bit of death-defying
slapstick with a touch of Laurel
and Hardy in the juxtaposition of Jonah Hill’s short, stocky inertia
against Channing Tatum’s chiseled, gravity-defying grace—bumbling cops Jenko
(Tatum) and Schmidt (Hill) are sent back
to school, to do what they do best, pose as students to bust a campus drug ring
whose newest designer pharmaceutical has just claimed its first life. “Do it just like the last time,” the cops’
surly commanding officer insists.
And just like the last time, 22
Jump Street gets some mileage out of pairing the tall, beefy, athletic
Jenko with the doughy, short, schlubby Schmidt. It’s an odd coupling that
continues to tickle a comedy sweet spot, especially as the two go their
slightly separate ways, reversing the first movie’s dynamic so as to place
Jenko in the role genetics intended for him, that of the popular superstar, and
Schmidt as the clumsy, socially awkward tag-along. Tatum’s character becomes a football
star and bros up to key suspect Zook (Wyatt
Russell), his quarterback soulmate. While the two fratboys get busy appreciating
each other’s alpha male awesomeness, Schmidt falls for smart, beautiful art
major Maya (Amber
Stevens).
The movie acknowledges its
own ridiculousness, starting with the absurd assumption that anyone would ever
believe Jenko and Schmidt were regular, 19 year-old students. “Tell us about
the war,” Maya’s roommate (Jillian
Bell), a witheringly, wonderfully sarcastic bitch, tells Schmidt, “any of
them.”
Lord and Miller dive deep into the leading characters’ bromance, and
all that homoerotic energy that bubbles under the surface of action buddy films
is brought out for some air. Before long Schmidt and Jenko are talking about how
maybe they should start investigating other people in a hilarious breakup
conversation adapted to police jargon. “You want an open investigation?” Schmidt asks unbelievingly, tears already
welling up in his eyes.
The actors are brilliant together. Hill knows how to milk Schmidt’s
hurt feelings for laughs instead of fake pathos, and it’s a real testament to
his gifts that he doesn’t overplay the sad-sack routine. But it’s Tatum who seems
especially boisterous and joyful here, like a mischievous first grader trapped
in a linebacker’s body. The actor has an astonishing gift for playing dumb
goodness, turning Jenko into the biggest, brawniest puppy in film history, a
human version of Ferdinand
the Bull, who would rather sit and smell the flowers than fight.
The college scenes are hit-and-miss, with a loose, improv-comedy feel. 22 Jump Street hits more often than not,
but even when it misses by a mile you have to appreciate the effort. Almost
worth the price of admission alone is Schmidt’s impromptu participation in a
slam poetry open mic night (sample lyric: “Jesus cried. Runaway bride!”). And
that’s if you don’t count the wry Annie
Hall homage in the opening credits and its unexpected development later
on, some of the greatest split-screen gags I’ve ever seen—including a
laugh-until-you cry Duck
Amuck-inspired extended drug trip—and a centerpiece with Ice Cube that
just about pays for every dumb Are We There Yet? comedy
on his résumé.
But the most enjoyable pleasures of this paean to summer silliness are the
small ones, like when the big, dim Jenko tries to cut a pane of glass with a
laser pointer, that almost audible little “ping” that sounds when he finally
grasps a crucial change in the relationship between Schmidt and Ice Cube’s hardass
Captain Dickson, or when, breathless and bursting with excitement over his
sleuthing skills, he informs his partner you can get the drug anywhere on
campus, at any time. The fact that it’s called Why-Phy (Work Hard Yes, Play
Hard Yes) and pronounced exactly like the wireless internet never burdened his
otherwise blissful mind.
“Nobody gave a shit about the Jump Street reboot,” says Dickson in an
early scene, the first of many, many, many
times when a character speaks about the fictional, undercover crime-fighting
operation in ways that clearly refer to the movie itself. But because the
reboot was so
successful in the story as well as the real world box office, Ice Cube’s
character continues, “We doubled the budget, as if that would double the
profit.” The film comments openly about repeating old formulas and the
perks—and imprudence—of working with a larger (but not unlimited) budget. It’s “always worse the second time around,” the
chief warns the two men, who are now given “carte blanche with the budget,
motherfuckers.” Operation headquarters is “twice as expensive” as the one in
the last movie “for no good reason.” About halfway through the film Jenko and
Schmidt will decimate a university sculpture garden and robotics lab, all the
while delivering a running commentary on how much money they’re wasting for no
discernible purpose.
The guiding comic principle here remains the appearance of ironic
detachment followed by an assertion of sincerity that’s as appealing as it is
disingenuous. But in the end, the film’s half-earnest acknowledgement that it’s
a tiresome sequel doesn’t save it from being a tiresome sequel. 22 Jump Street is wholly part of the
status-quo that it’s railing against, indulging in the same clichés it skewers.
And hammering us over the head again and again with the admission can get
tiresome, too—I lost my patience right around the thirteenth time someone said
something about doing it just like the last time.
The final
credits sequence is sublime, a sardonic take on all possible sequels the
“Jump Team” could ever make (culinary school! flight school! beauty school! ninja
school! dance school—taglined “Pointe and Shoot”), complete with merchandise
and tie-ins. It almost convinces you that you’re in on the joke, but the joke’s
on you. It’s a delusion to think of Lord and Miller as anything other than oil,
rather than sand, in the gears of conglomerated entertainment production. The
self-amused references to the film’s status as franchise fodder are funny and
ridiculous, right? Funny enough to keep taking your moviegoing money for years
to come, so see you up the street at No. 23 soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment