“Woman, sir, is a chalice,” a male character says in Jezebel (1938), “a frail, delicate chalice to be cherished and protected.” He’s clearly never met Bette Davis. The scathing gaze radiating from flashing eyes that betray an obvious intelligence and brilliant flamboyance, the deep, scalding voice, the arrogance, toughness, and brittle aggressiveness, no, Bette Davis was no frail and delicate chalice. One of the greatest and most daring female stars of classical Hollywood cinema, an icon and a powerful woman on and off the screen, Bette Davis transcended the limitations of her sexual identity in films as diverse as William Wyler’s Jezebel and The Little Foxes (1940), Joseph L. Mankiewicz’s All About Eve (1950), and Robert Aldrich’s What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962). Never a traditional beauty, she thrived because of her attitude, her mastery of movement and emotional detail, her personal style, forcefulness and willingness to be disliked and to tap into her vast neurotic potential. Hers is a world of sumptuous glamor and tempestuous emotionalism: the savage lavishness of the Old South, the intellectual New York theater milieu of high class premieres and awards parties, and, finally, Hollywood wealth and decadence decayed into a perverse and outrageous travesty.
In Jezebel,
Davis plays Julie Marsden, a rich belle in antebellum New Orleans. Julie
exercises the largest possible freedom within a rigidly structured society that
allows women no other career than that of coquette. Feminine and flirtatious,
Davis looks the part, but her character is too ambitious and intelligent for
the docile role society has deemed her worthy of. She values the predominance
of her own will more than love and marriage, more than society, indeed, it
seems, more than anything. In long tracking shots, the camera swaying,
swooping, gliding, dollying, and craning in an unbroken continuity, we see the
environment she inhabits; 1852 New Orleans is bustling with activity, and the
bourgeoisie is on display, in top hats and carrying canes, discussing purebreds
and society balls. There is something
both noble and savagely inadequate about Wyler’s South, and Julie is a
reflection and a product of her surroundings; she is “quick and dangerous” like
the South itself or, in Amy’s (Margaret Lindsay) words, “strange and beautiful
- and a little frightening... because of its strangeness and beauty, I
suppose.” The film revolves around Julie; all other characters are drawn to or
shy away from her, and it is before her arrivals and after her departures that
they fuss and flutter. Like so many
Davis heroines, Julie is admirable and dislikeable in equal measure, and just a
bit crazy.
From the first time we see her, we can
tell she is different from all the other girls, who she can tell are “just
pretty and narrow-minded.” Late to her own party—she “never was on time for
anything in her life”—she rides in on a rowdy horse. If he’s scared of the
horse biting, she tells the stable boy, “you just plain bite him back,” and
it’s not farfetched to imagine she actually would. Flying in the face of
convention when she decides to go in still dressed in her riding clothes
anticipates her future, more serious sartorial mishap. The outfit suggests
dynamism, athleticism, and independence—all improper attributes for a lady.
Julie’s fiancée is Preston Dillard (Henry Fonda), a gentle, “business before
pleasure” banker who puts up with many of her shenanigans. “Don’t you fret
about Pres,” Julie tells Aunt Belle, “I’ve been training him for years,” but he
will prove to be less yielding than the horse and not as likely to accept her biting
him back. Pre-war Southern society is portrayed as staunchly paternalistic, a
world in which women must be kept in check and accept, even appreciate their
limitations. A generation ago, we’re told, a man “would have cut him a hickory
and he’d have flailed the living daylights out of [a woman like Julie] and then
help put lard on her welts and bought her a diamond broach (…) And she’d have
loved it.”
Upset because Pres refuses to go with
her to the dressmaker’s for her last fitting before the Olympus Ball, Julie
decide to change her virginal, pure white dress for a fiery red, knowing
exactly the kind of uproar it would cause at an event in which unmarried women
traditionally wear white. “Saucy, isn’t it?” she asks, and when her aunt’s
response is “and vulgar,” she smiles triumphantly, as if that had been the
greatest compliment: “yes, isn’t it?” She insists the times are changing and
“girls don't have to simp around in white just because they’re not married.”
When Preston finally sees the dress and
is outraged, she challenges him, revolting against being treated like a child,
although she may act like one. Asking if he’s concerned she might be mistaken
for a prostitute, she quickly corrects herself, “I forgot I’m a child. I
shouldn’t know about the girls on Gallatan Street. I’m just supposed to flutter
around in white.” Her act of resistance, although it seems trivial, has
immediate and negative consequences; in antebellum New Orleans—as well as in
thirties Hollywood—a woman has to pay for her vanity. The scene at the ball is
almost too painful to watch, as all the other guests move away from her and
stare in silence, and point of view shots make us feel firsthand what Julie
felt in her act of defiance and disgrace when scandalized couples backed away
from her on the dance floor. The same night she has been humiliated, she loses
her fiancé, who cannot forgive her, first of all, for tarnishing his reputation and offers not a word of
solace after refusing to allow Julie to leave the party. As Preston leaves, her
face is for the first time shot in darkness, and although she might say he’ll
come back, she knows as well as the audience that won’t happen this time.
One year later, she spends all day
tending the house and faithfully awaiting his return from the North. Instead of
accusing him of being cruel she blames herself, thinking she had been “vicious”
and “selfish” and preparing to beg his forgiveness. Dressed in the white gown
she refused to wear for the ball, she is not only pure, but also innocent and
vulnerable. Not knowing he has married another woman, she kneels on the floor
to apologize, reaching her lowest point in the film. Through the placement of
the actors within the frame, Wyler makes it clear he passes no judgment on her
when she kisses a married man, but when
she begs for forgiveness she is placed so low as to almost fall off the edge of
the screen as Preston towers above. When she realizes he is married and decides
to win him back, the camera captures her in a low angle shot that demonstrates
the director respects her for her immense strength and resolution. “To think I
want to be wept over,” Julie rebuffs her aunt; “I need to think, to plan, to
fight.” “But you can’t fight marriage,” the older woman insists. “Marriage?”
she questions, the word in italics, “to that washed out little Yankee? Pres is
mine; he’s always been mine, and if I can’t have him…”
Charming and feminine, what Molly
Haskell would call a “superfemale,” Julie flirts with and pits two men against
each other: Preston, enlightened by his trip to the North, and Buck Cantrell
(George Brent), a Southern gentleman through and through, old-fashioned,
“course and loud,” but with a deeply ingrained code of honor and morality. When
Buck battles it out with Ted (Richard Cromwell) over some heated words, Julie,
despite all her flowery femininity, regrets the prerogatives only ascribed to
men: “Sometimes I envy them… To face the one you hate, to kill or be killed, to
settle something, we can’t do that, women.” Because she is a woman, and because
she has sinned, she must, in the heavily contrived end, make herself “clean
again the way [Amy] is clean.” For this, she must make the ultimate sacrifice, accompanying
the sick Preston to the condemned Lazarette Island, ensuring herself almost
certain death. In the last scene, a low angle profile shot, she is completely redeemed,
an almost divine image of altruism and martyrdom. In becoming selfless, however,
Julie loses her self—the defining characteristics and flaws of her individualism.
In the profile shot, she is neither facing us nor the hellish fire that burns
in the background, transcending her individuality, her environment and all the
suffering that comes with it, and becoming neither something less nor something
more than what she was, but something else entirely: she is no longer a person
but a symbol; her viewpoint is not singular but becomes plural, a
representation of all women who, like Jezebel, “did evil in the sight of God”
and must repent.
“Well I reckon princesses, they just
naturally grows up to be queens, that’s all,” Cato says about Julie in Jezebel, and playing the appropriately
named Regina Giddens in The Little Foxes,
Davis is just that—a Southern queen bee with one hell of a sting. Her third
collaboration with Wyler after Jezebel and
The Letter (1940), this grim and
malignant melodrama, shot by cinematographer Gregg Toland in sharp focus and
hard, realistic textures, centers on a trio of revoltingly greedy siblings, and
Regina, as the one sister, is the greediest and the most monstrous of the three.
As a woman, she has no power in the ruthless, ambitious post-Civil War Alabama,
but she rules her household and her life with relentless self-interest. Regina’s
authority is made apparent even before she appears onscreen, when we’re told
“she ain’t nobody to keep waiting.” When we do see her, it’s on a high balcony,
commanding attention through her very being—the way she talks, her gestures and
poised confidence—as well as her placement above all the other characters. In
the following scene she is cutting roses in the garden to be placed in vases;
like her, the flowers are beautiful but thorny, and are being carved,
curtailed, and contained in much the same way she has been by society.
Although she cannot participate and
benefit financially from the deal her brothers Ben (Charles Dingle) and Oscar
(Carl Benton Reid) are setting up with William Marshall (Russell Hicks), she
has more tact and a better sense of business than the two of them combined, and
she refuses to be silenced like her sister-in-law Birdie (Patricia Collinge).
Regina can sting as well as soothe, and when the men talk she sits between them
to interject and control the conversation and charm her way into sealing the
deal in a manner her brothers never could, even kicking Ben when he stirs his
coffee too loudly. While Birdie has had her voice taken away from her through
her marriage, Regina takes part in the meeting and even toasts with the men.
After Marshall has left, she sits down with them as if she were preparing to
occupy her throne, leaning back in the velvety armchair in a low angle shot.
She plans to go to Chicago with her daughter, Alexandra (Teresa Wright), she
tells them, and later take trips to New York and Paris, “and have what I want,
everything I want,” which comes down to independence, freedom, and cold hard
cash. As she admits, she married Horace (Herbert Marshall) because she was
lonely, “not in the way people usually mean. I was lonely for all the things I wasn’t
gonna get.” Regina thought Horace could get the world for her, but when he
didn’t she decided to do it herself, even if she risked ruling it alone.
“You’re our sister,” Ben tells her; “we
want you to benefit from everything we
do,” as if she has no part in it whatsoever. And benefit she will, asking for a
larger share of the profits in exchange for her husband’s sorely needed investment.
When her brothers laugh it off, she assures them “I don’t ask for things I
don’t think I can get,” circling them like a prey animal. Regina does things
her own way, refusing to give in to the Southern belle etiquette her family
ascribes to. “How many times did mama tell you it’s unwise for a good-looking
woman to frown? How many times have I told you that softness and a smile will
do more to the hearts of men?” her brothers ask, but looking down on them from
the top of the stairs, she guarantees she knows what she’s doing. Her cruelty
and inhumanity, her need to “eat up the whole earth and all the people on it”
will get her what she wants, but at what price? Although not actually killing
her husband, she indifferently waits in the shadows and watches him suffer and
die, which might be even more gruesome than if she had done it herself. The
camera remains on her face throughout this scene, captured in a closeup in the
foreground while Horace struggles in the background; her calm and watchful
expression is more chilling than witnessing the death.
A little fox that spoils the vines, in
the end Regina gets what she wants, but she is no freer than she was in the
beginning. Alienating Alexandra, she is left alone in the prison she has built
for herself. In the last scene of the film she stands at the top of the stairs,
but the carefully constructed mise-en-scene makes it clear that although she
has made it to the top she is bound by the actions that led her there. Shot
from behind in the foreground, Regina looks trapped; we see what she sees: the
railing in front of her resembling prison bars, with strong pillars on each side
and rails on the upper edge of the frame on the other side of the room next to
the wall. She is caged, with no escape in any direction, and as she watches
Alexandra leave with David through the bars in the foreground, the only thing
she can do is step back into darkness and pull the curtain in willing isolation,
the last poignant symbol of her separation from the outside world.
Mankiewicz’s All About Eve is perhaps Bette Davis’ best known movie, and one of
the greatest she has ever starred in. She plays Margo Channing, an aging, acid
creature with a cantankerous ego and a stinging tongue whose bravura and quick
wit mask an underlying vulnerability and throttled passion. The film tells the
story of young ingénue Eve Harrington (Anne Baxter), a breathless fan whose
bright eyes brim with false sincerity and humility who worms herself into
Margo’s good graces and circle of friends only to betray her. But although Eve
is the title character, and the one who is receiving the award in the first
scene, the movie truly is all about Margo Channing. She is not defeated by the
end of All About Eve, but victorious,
her will and personality triumphant over the superficial, fleeting qualities of
youth and beauty; while Eve is a type, Margo is an individual.
The opening scene plunges us into the
world these characters inhabit, a world in which “a lifetime is a season and a
season a lifetime,” and graciousness and genteel manners hide a marked capacity
for ruthlessness, a world in which what people say and what they mean is never
the same thing and one’s intentions are only a matter of interpretation, like the
plays themselves. “Real diamonds in a wig, what a world we live in!” one
character exclaims, and, indeed, everything is an act in this world, not the
least of which the syrupy, stirring story Eve has created for herself: “Eve…
Eve the golden girl, the cover girl, the girl next door, the girl on the moon.
Time has been good to Eve. Life goes where she goes. She’s been profiled,
covered, revealed, reported, what she eats and what she wears, whom she knows
and where she was and when and where she’s going. Eve… You all know all about
Eve.” Our guide though this universe is theater critic and commentator Addison
DeWitt (George Sanders), his voiceover dripping with sarcasm. The Sarasin
Society award presenter praises Eve’s greatness and generosity, but certain
audience members’ faces tell a different story: Margo, playwright Lloyd Richards
(Hugh Marlowe), his wife Karen (Celeste Holme), and director Bill Simpson (Gary
Merrill) sit and stare with a mix of amusement, disbelief, and hatred. And when
the presenter has finished his speech and the applause thunders, they refuse to
clap.
Margo, cold and calm, enveloped in a
constant cloud of cigarette smoke which acts almost as a visible representation
of her charisma, is “a star of the theater. She made her first stage appearance
at the age of four in “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”; she played a fairy and
entered quite unexpectedly stark naked. She has been a star ever since. Margo
is a great star, a true star; she never was nor ever will be anything less or
anything else.” As the characters’
remembrances bring us back in time, we witness Margo’s greatness. Finishing a
performance of Lloyd’s latest play, the suggestively entitled “Aged in Wood,”
she makes her way to her dressing room and asks the playwright to “write me one
about a nice normal woman who shoots her husband.” Arrogant, vain, and vociferous,
she insists that fans are not people, not knowing Eve is outside the door. When
Karen brings her in, Margo watches her with a mix of skepticism and interest
and believes her story of hardship and adoration; of course Margo has no
problem accepting that others would want to devote their lives to her. In her
dressing room, with no makeup on, her hair a post-wig mess, in short, “looking
like a junkyard,” Margo’s appearance suggests the actress is letting her guard
down and that she is in a vulnerable position. After she gets dressed and once
again looks the part, she seems to have regained control of the situation as
she accompanies Bill to the airport, but right before his departure she lets
her true feelings show, telling him not to get “stuck on some glamor puss” in
Hollywood. Margo becomes protective over Eve, almost motherly, saying she’s
“forgotten they grew that way” and seeing the young girl as “a lamb loose in
our big stone jungle.” Although, as Bill tells her later on, “outside of a
beehive, Margo, you wouldn’t be considered queenly or motherly.”
Soon, she has let Eve into her home and
heart, accepting her as assistant, “sister, lawyer, mother, friend,
psychiatrist; (…) the honeymoon was on.” But something seems off from the
beginning, perhaps because of the intensity of Eve’s eyes whenever she looks at
Margo, but she refuses to see it, and there is a price she has to pay for her pride.
By the film’s most famous scene—beginning with the iconic “Fasten your
seatbelts. It’s gonna be a bumpy night”—Margo is suspicious of Eve, but no one
around her understands and she can’t quite explain why she is jealous of the
girl when it comes to Bill. Davis delivers the ensuing pithy and pungent
remarks fully and boldly, and it’s a pleasure to watch her take everything
other characters say and twist it to fit her purpose. The staccato rhythm and
pacing of the high-velocity dialogue sounds like music. “A girl with so many
interests,’ Margo remarks about Eve and, told it is a rare quality continues
“so many rare qualities (…) so many qualities so often (…) and so young! So
young and so fair!” When another guest remarks Eve has a “quality of quiet
graciousness”—which no one could accuse Margo or Davis of—she snaps “among so
many quiet qualities,” raising her eyebrows so high that it looks like any more
strain would make them pop right off her face.
The arrival of DeWitt with Miss Casswell (a glowing, scene-stealing young Marilyn), “a graduate of the Copacabana School of Dramatic Arts” further antagonizes Margo, who is left to hold her coat while DeWitt walks away holding Eve’s arm. Surrounded by beauty and youth, Margo does the only thing she can: drink until she can’t hold a martini glass anymore, daintily depositing her olives in the coffee cups Birdie (Thelma Ritter) systematically tries to push on her. And if her guests don’t like her behavior, she loudly proclaims, she “suggest[s] they accompany [Bill] to the nursery.” Confessing she is forty years old, she “suddenly feel[s] as if [she’s] taken all her clothes off,” concluding that, “Bill’s 32. He looks 32. He looked it five years ago. He’ll look it twenty years from now. I hate men.”
The arrival of DeWitt with Miss Casswell (a glowing, scene-stealing young Marilyn), “a graduate of the Copacabana School of Dramatic Arts” further antagonizes Margo, who is left to hold her coat while DeWitt walks away holding Eve’s arm. Surrounded by beauty and youth, Margo does the only thing she can: drink until she can’t hold a martini glass anymore, daintily depositing her olives in the coffee cups Birdie (Thelma Ritter) systematically tries to push on her. And if her guests don’t like her behavior, she loudly proclaims, she “suggest[s] they accompany [Bill] to the nursery.” Confessing she is forty years old, she “suddenly feel[s] as if [she’s] taken all her clothes off,” concluding that, “Bill’s 32. He looks 32. He looked it five years ago. He’ll look it twenty years from now. I hate men.”
Halfway through the party scene, she
stands next to a huge oil painting of herself; this is her image, and her
greatness, and no wet-behind-the-ears girl can take it away from her, she seems
to say, and by this point in the film no one would argue with that statement.
But the last shot of the scene is of another painting of Margo, this time
smaller. By the end of the party the character has been diminished, both by
Eve’s plotting and her own childish behavior. Margo doesn’t know who and what
she is, her identity tied up too closely to her onstage persona and her
occupation as an actress, “a breed apart from the rest of humanity, (…) the
original displaced personalities.” “So many people know me,” she tells Karen.
“I wish I did. I wish someone told me about me.” She is Margo Channing, Karen
says; “and what is that besides something spelled out in light bulbs, besides
something called a temperament, which consists mostly of swooping about on a
broomstick and screaming at the top of my voice?”
The day after the party, when she finds
out Eve has been her understudy and her reading at the rehearsal was “fresh and
new and full of meaning,” she is standing next to an almost life-size
caricature of herself, and her insecurities and mercurial outbursts of jealousy
and rage have turned her into just that. Her remarks, steeped in sarcasm and
self-mockery, also diminish her. When DeWitt tells her she used to be full of
music and fire, she says, “that’s me—an old kazoo and some sparklers.” As Karen
says, Margo tends to compensate for underplaying onstage by overplaying in real
life, and her showdown with Bill and Lloyd, appropriately set on the theater
stage, is a perfect example. While Bill wants to make peace and move on with
their lives, she refuses to give in, considering his terms “unconditional
surrender,” and proclaims she “won’t be had for the price of a cocktail, like a
salted peanut.” It is only when he throws her on the bed and literally holds
her down that she listens to what he is saying, but concludes “it’s obvious
[he’s] not a woman,” and therefore can’t understand.
But
it is her womanliness that she wishes to regain, hating Eve for being “so
young, so feminine, so helpless—all the things I want to be for Bill.” She
would gladly give up her career in the theater for him, but she wouldn’t know
where to begin: “Funny business, a woman’s career. The things you drop on the
way up the ladder so you can move faster, you forger you need them again when
you get back to being a woman. There’s one career all females have in common,
whether we like it or not—being a woman. Sooner or later we have to work at it,
no matter how many careers we’ve had or wanted.” And here lies the main
difference between men and women and the way they are portrayed onscreen (at
least in the fifties); while men can have their cake and eat it too,
maintaining their career and financial independence while having a family,
women’s main job is that of wife and mother, and an actual career would get in
the way. And the things Margo dropped on her way up the ladder are her
traditional female characteristics, the femininity and helplessness she envies
Eve for. In the business world she has to take on masculine qualities in order
to thrive, implying that only by relinquishing their sexual identity can women
reach the top. As a representative for the female sex it is implied you need
men, because, as Margo says, without a man “you’re not a woman. You’re
something with a French provincial office and a book of clippings, but you’re
not a woman.” So, in the end, Margo becomes a woman, crying as Bill holds her
to his chest, and declaring she doesn’t need make-believe anymore, onstage or
off, because she’s “finally got a life to live.” Her glowing career, wealth,
fame, and close friends are apparently worthless if she’s not married. The
point of All About Eve, however, is not that women can’t make it on their own,
which would set feminists around the world ablaze with indignation, but that
this particular woman doesn’t want to. Margo is neither flawless nor fearless,
but her uncertainties and faults are what make her real, and that’s part of the
reason we root for her and not Eve.
Davis
went from a star of the theater to a washed up child star in Aldrich’s What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? An
exercise is old-fashioned horror tropes and techniques, the movie boils down to
a horror of confinement, capturing two sisters, Blanche (Joan Crawford) and
Jane Hudson in the claustrophobic intimacy of an gloomy, decayed Hollywood
mansion as old and worn as the title character. Baby Jane is a caricature, a
travesty, a grotesque exaggeration of Davis’ exaggerations. While the actress
used to bite off her lines, now she plain snarls, shrieks and shrills like a
maniac; her commanding presence becomes domineering and terrifying; and her
eyes, which in other films dart with intelligence and alertness now lie fully
and startlingly open, intensely focusing with evil, demented glee. It’s like a
reflection of Davis as seen in a funhouse mirror: we can make out a bold
outline that vaguely resembles reality, but the image has been distorted almost
beyond recognition. Only 54 when the movie was shot, Bette Davis looks like
she’s pushing seventy in the heavy, monstrous makeup.
Jane
is a blonde, ringletted former child vaudeville star who built her reputation
and career on mawkish, saccharine songs like “I’ve Written a Letter to Daddy,”
playing sweet and innocent onstage while acting like a vicious, spoiled brat
off. Blanche, a plain, introspective little girl, grew up to become Hollywood
royalty, her cinematic stardom far exceeding and eclipsing Jane’s and driving a
wedge of resentment and jealousy between the two. Now Jane spends her days
drinking, dreaming of a career she will never have, and slowly torturing her
wheelchair-bound sister to death. The “accident” that landed her in the chair
is captured before the opening credits in a flurry of quick edits of
decontextualized closeups as the morbid, mordant tones of Frank DeVol’s score
create a deep sense of uneasiness and confusion which works all the better for
the contrived but appropriately shocking explanation at the end. The opening
credits are presented over the unsettling image of a Baby Jane doll with her
head broken open, and what could be a better metaphor of the character’s mental
condition?
Just
as the intact doll had been a perfect representation of the little
girl—beautiful, still, and lifeless, caught forever in child form, the image of
the mashed head expresses Jane’s state of arrested development that evolves—or,
actually, devolves—into hysteria and insanity. While Blanche is physically
crippled, Jane is mentally stunted; she grew old without growing up. At her
age, she sports long curly blonde hair fastened with colorful ribbons, frumpy,
frilly little girl costumes and garish, masklike makeup in a failed attempt to
look and feel young. The haphazard
production design and mise-en-scene of multiple intersecting and clashing
planes of vision, lines, and patterns are a perfect external representation of
Jane’s inner state. Perhaps the most outrageous and tragic delusion is a
conviction that she can revive her act, and as she prances around the house in
creepy, slatternly, girlish dresses, she inspires as much pity as terror. When
she steps into the light in front of the mirror the way she used to step into
the spotlight, her features contorted into a horrifying, twisted reflection,
she breaks down and cries; the strident sounds that escape her mouth are more
akin to those of a wounded wild animal.
Blanche
chooses to be sentimental and see the best in her sister, remembering her when
she was young: “It wasn’t just that she was pretty. She was different. She was
so alive…” But time has not been good to her, and alcoholism has only deepened
her cruelty and spite; in one scene, shot from inside the liquor cabinet, we
see her distorted by empty bottles, perhaps a representation of how she,
herself, sees the world. Now Jane torments her sister, who is completely
dependent on her, alternately starving her and bringing her a dead and cooked
pet canary or a rat on a silver platter, copying her signature for checks,
refusing to let her go out or receive visitors, sell the house, even talk on
the phone, and finally tying her in her room and putting tape over her mouth. When
Blanche tries to reason with Jane and explain they must sell the
house—Valentino’s old mansion which Blanche paid for—because they can’t afford
it, Jane insists it was in fact “daddy” who bought it for her and firmly tells
her sister, “you’re never gonna sell this house and you ain’t never gonna leave
it!” As she says this, we notice the pattern of the robe she’s wearing is
nearly identical to that of the chair she’s sitting on and the wallpaper in the
background; she has become a part of the house, as immovable, lifeless, and
permanent as the furniture and decoration. The scene following immediately
after shows Blanche wheel herself to the door of the room, only to discover she
is hemmed in, trapped by the wall, the railing, and the furniture, so close
together it looks like she couldn’t fit a wheelchair through.
After
Jane kills their maid and the police start asking her questions, she once again
reverts to a childhood state, going to Blanche for help, like a kid throwing a
tantrum when he knows he did something wrong but insists it wasn’t his fault
and trying to convince her to run away and live on the beach like when they
were little. In the last, tragic scene, her delusion is complete. Even more
cartoonish, caricatured and more tragic and
grotesque than Norma Desmond when she prepares herself for her closeup, Jane
dances on the beach as a crowd gathers to watch in an overhead shot that does,
for the first time in the film, make her look small and vulnerable.
“You’re
maudlin and full of self-pity,” Addison tells Margo in All About Eve, and while that might apply to the character, it
definitely doesn’t apply to Bette Davis. “You’re magnificent!” he
continues. Now that she was. A great star of the studio and immediate post-studio
period, she succeeded in capturing the imaginations—if perhaps not the
hearts—of so many because of, and not despite, her unconventionality and
strength. Admired, disliked, feared, pitied, hated, or despised, the one thing
she has never been is overlooked. Her performances draw deep feelings from the
audience; although not always positive responses, they are anything but
indifferent. In Jezebel, The Little Foxes, All About Eve, and What Ever
Happened to Baby Jane?, she rises above traditional notions of femininity
and becomes more, transcending gender roles and creating individuals that are
forceful, fascinating and completely unique.
No comments:
Post a Comment