“I
knew I belonged to the public and to the world, not because I was talented or
even beautiful but because I had never belonged to anything or anyone else,”
writes Marilyn Monroe in her unfinished autobiography (Steinem 9). Indeed, her
short, tumultuous life was not her own. She belonged to her audiences and to
the studios, perhaps the last of the larger-than-life movie-movie stars whose
images depended on, were shaped and shattered by the public. A fiction of the
fifties, she became the ghost of the sixties, and, in her death and the
poignancy of her incompleteness, secured her enduring power. She was a myth, a
fantasy, a hypothesis, a radiating image of the American Dream, and the image
had little to do with reality. The shy little girl who was never allowed to
mature into a woman, Norma Jeane, was what set her apart from all the other sex
goddesses. She was not a goddess, but an angel of sex. Her wistfulness,
yearning, innocence, and childish naiveté lent a soft edge of sadness to her
performances. The true auteur of her films, she infused every corner of them
and invested sex with sweetness; she was a vulnerable, virgin-like vamp. Her
best films, among them Howard Hawks’ Gentlemen
Prefer Blondes (1953), Billy Wilder’s The
Seven Year Itch (1955) and Some Like
It Hot (1959), Joshua Logan’s Bus
Stop (1956) and John Huston’s The
Misfits(1961), suggest the discrepancy between the reality of the woman
(and little girl) represented by Norma Jeane and the illusion of the sexpot
represented by Marilyn Monroe.
While
she was still playing inconsequential roles in studio factory products and
vehicles for other stars, she was noticed in part due to two small performances:
Angela Phinlay in Huston’s Asphalt Jungle,
where she played the young mistress of an aging criminal to strong reviews, and
the unforgettable Miss Caswell in Joseph Mankiewicz’ All About Eve (both released in 1950). In these two roles, and
countless others, we notice the dichotomy between Norma Jeane and Marilyn,
between the serious, vulnerable woman of Huston’s film and the ditzy sexpot of
Mankiewicz’, “a graduate of the Copacabana school of dramatic arts.” As Miss
Caswell, Monroe glows. Dressed in white, in contrast to the rest of the
darkly-cladded characters, she draws the light and the viewer’s eye with such
force that we all but forget about Bette Davis or George Sanders in what might
be their best respective parts. Her voice is so fragile, so soft and childish
it comes off as a surprising incongruity to her sexualized appearance—one
expects the low and sexy drawl of the femme fatale. “Why do they always look
like unhappy rabbits,” she asks about a theater producer before proceeding to
make him happy. And just as Sanders’ sardonic theater critic Addison DeWitt can
see her “career rising in the East like the sun,” every viewer could anticipate
Monroe’s career rising in the West.
Gentlemen Prefer Blondes is Marilyn’s
ultimate Technicolor extravaganza, and a film whose look underlines the theme
of appearance over essence, of a dazzling, gleaming façade as a cover for
emptiness. With reds and pinks clashing so mercilessly in the cinematography,
it’s hard to look away long enough to see what’s below the surface. In the
hands of any other actress the film and Lorelei Lee would both be nothing more
than empty vessels, but her performance makes both transcend their most obvious
natures. She sets the tone of the film so fully as to preempt the director and
cinematographer, and “the movie rises above its pretext, its story, its
existence as a musical, even its music, and becomes at its best a magic work”
(Mailer 104).
On
the surface, Lorelei is only interested in money, “the only girl who can stand
on a stage with a spotlight in her eyes and still see a diamond inside a man’s
pocket.” She is not the brightest girl
either, asking the way to Europe, France, worrying about her friend and saying
she “needs someone like I to educate her,” or trying to figure out how to put a
tiara around her neck. When told it goes on her head, she says, “You must think
I was born yesterday.” “Sometimes there’s just no other possible explanation,”
Jane Russell’s Dorothy explains. Others are less than kind in their descriptions
of Lorelei, calling her a “blonde man-trap” or a “mercenary dimwit.” But even
though she wears leopard print on her way to the boat and seems ready to pounce
at the first sparkle of a stone, she is far from a predator. When she first gets on the boat she
immediately jumps up and down on the bed like a child, and the whole trouble
with the picture evolves from a very innocent game of role-play: “Piggy was
being the python, and I was the goat,” she insists. The only male she is open
to is a young boy who helps her get out of a tight spot—literally—when she gets
stuck in the window. There is exuberance, energy, and the innocence of youth in
this performance, not the least in her single-minded determination to get what
she wants. The men she meets along the way seem more likely to want to protect
her than take advantage of her.
There
is a marked difference between Lorelei and Dorothy, Jane Russell’s character
taking on a protective, almost motherly role while chaperoning her friend. The
differences between the two are reflected in their costuming and singing styles
as well. While Lorelei dresses in bright, youthful colors, Dorothy is mostly
seen in black and muted greys. The only scene Lorelei wears a dark color in is
after they have been kicked out of their hotel and they have to rally and look
for a job, singing “When Love Goes Wrong.” Marilyn’s voice stands in sharp
contrast to her co-star’s as well. While Russell is strong and assertive in her
musical numbers, Monroe caresses every word of the lyrics, her mellow, moody
crooning lasciviously underlining her sexiness and vulnerability. Again, there
is a sadness and poignancy in many of her remarks that helps the movie
transcend its existence as a comedy. When Lorelei says, “A girl like I almost
never gets to meet really interesting men; sometimes my brain gets real
starved,” it’s funny, but the rest of her statement is decidedly sadder and
more truthful: “It’s a terrible thing to be lonesome, especially in the middle
of a crowd.”
Lorelei
is not as dumb as she seems, either. She can get out of trouble as easily as
she gets herself in it, through intuition, intelligence, and innovation. By the
last scenes of the movie we begin to understand that Lorelei Lee is just a
facade, no different than the Marilyn persona, and beneath it lies a young
woman not unlike Norma Jeane. “I can be smart when it’s important,” she tells
her future father-in-law, “but most men don’t like it.” She is, like Sugar Kane
in Billy Wilder’s Some Like It Hot, more
than a gold-digger and actually has feelings for Gus (Tommy Noonan). “Don’t you
know that a man being rich is like a girl being pretty,” she asks his father.
“You might not marry a girl just because she’s pretty, but, my goodness,
doesn’t it help? And if you had a daughter, wouldn’t you rather she didn’t
marry a poor man? You’d want her to have the most wonderful things in the world
and to be very happy. Why is it wrong for me to want those things?” In this statement she captures one of the
many reasons for Marilyn’s appeal, what Norman Mailer calls “her noble
democratic longings” and Faustian ambition, in which “we can see the magnified
mirror of ourselves” (17). It is this identification with her above all other
“sexpots” that ensures her endurance, the way she hooked into our deepest
emotions of hope or fear, and told us “more about ourselves than we would have
known without her” (Haskell 258).
After
stealing How to Marry a Millionaire
(1953) from under Betty Grable and Lauren Bacall, and again wasting her talents
on pictures like River of No Return
(1953), with Robert Mitchum, what she called a “Z cowboy film in which the
acting finished second to the scenery and the CinemaScope process” and There’s No Business Like Show Business (1954),
a critical disaster, Marilyn will bring to life one of her most iconic
characters. “As if she has been drilled in the metaphysical differences between
two strikes and three, she will be at her best,” Mailer writes in his biography
of the star (123). As The Girl in
Wilder’s The Seven Year Itch (1955),
Marilyn creates one last American innocent, “a pristine artifact of the
mid-Eisenhower years, an American girl who believes
in the products she sells in TV commercials—she is as simple and healthy as the
whole middle of the country, and there to be plucked” (Mailer 123).
The
actress also gets to indulge her vamp persona, in Sherman’s (Tom Ewell)
intricate day-dreams and fantasies. Because these images of her as a femme
fatale are presented in the context of wild, ridiculous imaginings, their
artificiality and unsuitability is made even more evident. Descending the
staircase—much as Barbara Stanwyck did in the director’s Double Indemnity—in a sparkling, sequined tiger-striped evening
gown while holding a cigarette, Marilyn is stunning; her performance transcends
artifice and becomes art. But Marilyn is no Barbara Stanwyck; her innocence and
sweetness override this sexualized image, which is not nearly as appealing as
the real girl who shows up in a cotton-candy pink outfit. Playing the role of
the other woman, the mistress and home-wrecker, and making it look sympathetic
is no easy task, but The Girl is as wholesome and pure as her lily-white
dresses. She’s beautiful and sweet-natured, “a wide-eyed innocent who thinks
that everything is ‘just elegant,’ recognizes classical music ‘because there’s
no vocal,’ and stays cool by storing her panties in the refrigerator. ‘Marilyn
Monroe doesn’t just play The Girl,’ said the play’s author. George Axelrod. ‘She
is The Girl’” (Buskin 67).
From
the moment she steps into the film, her natural radiance lights it up, and her
personality infuses every frame with a blithe and buoyant sense of unbridled
joy. A small-town girl in the big city, she knows no one and drinks “big tall”
martinis with sugar, or sips champagne while munching on potato chips. Her
helplessness and childlike clumsiness make us want to put our arm around her
and protect her. The only reason she meets Sherman is because she has forgotten
her key, and then proceeds to get her things stuck in the door as she enters
the building. When he sees her at the balcony upstairs, Wilder captures her in
a low angle shot, but she is not the least threatening or imposing; she is
naked, covered only by the foliage of her potted plants, but this speaks more
of her innocence and obliviousness than her sexuality. She’s delighted to find
out Sherman is married because that means he can’t fall in love with her and
ask her to marry him—“it’s all so simple and can’t possibly get drastic.” Like
Lorelei and Sugar Kane, The Girl wants a man who is nice, tender, and
understanding, not one who is tall, handsome and wears a striped vest and a
“I’m-so-handsome-you-can’t-resist-me look” like Tom McKenzie (Sonny Tufts).
Four
thousand people gathered in the street at two a.m. to watch Wilder film the
iconic scene in which the rush of air from the passing subway lifts her dress.
But it was not Marilyn that the film audiences got to see in this scene, but
Norma Jeane, the girl who spent most of her childhood in and out of foster
homes and orphanages because her mother was mentally unsuited to take care of
her, the girl who never knew her father and always felt unwanted and unloved.
Of course she would identify with the Monster form The Creature from the Black Lagoon, and say, “he was kind of scary
looking, but he wasn’t really all bad. I think he just craved a little
affection, you know, a sense of being loved and needed and wanted.”
Wilder,
better than anyone, understands that Marilyn is only a mask for Norma Jeane, an
illusion, and engages this in a hilariously self-conscious, almost
postmodernist way when Ewell’s character jokes about having Marilyn Monroe in
the kitchen. In Wilder’s Some Like It Hot,
Marilyn greatest performance and her greatest film, she is again more akin to
the virgin than the vamp. Soft-focused and softly lit, encircled by a halo of
light, she is more like The Girl than is at first apparent. Marilyn entices
audiences as the sexpot in her musical numbers, but this is, even in the
context of the film, only a performance. The real Sugar, Kowalczyc not Kane,
is, like Norma Jeane, an innocent little girl who plays on the beach and always
gets “the fuzzy end of the lollipop.” It is this side of her and not the
luscious Sugar Kane who bobs up and down in the spotlight in a sheer, sequined,
form-fitting gown who “will take an improbable farce and somehow offer some
indefinable sense of promise to every absurd logic in the dumb scheme of things
until the movie becomes that rarest of modern art objects, an affirmation” (Mailer 175).
If
Gentlemen Prefer Blondes and The Seven Year Itch are Marilyn at her
movie-movie star Technicolor, CinemaScope best, then Bus Stop and her last finished project, The Misfits, show the serious, black-and-white side of the actress
that corresponds more to Norma Jeane. In Logan’s Bus Stop, Monroe plays an unsophisticated, tawdry southern saloon
singer who has gotten the fuzzy end of the lollipop her entire life. Dressed in
ratty clothes and ripped stockings, her surroundings, makeup, and hair lacking
their usual glamor, Marilyn applied what she learned studying with Lee
Strasberg at the Actors Studio in New York. She inhabits the character with the
assuredness and grace of a trained Method actor, and makes us forget the
existence of Marilyn as a glittering movie star, allowing us to focus instead
on the lost girl of Logan’s film.
The
weakest parts of the movie are the ones that center on Don Murray’s character,
who seems stuck in a campy cowboy comedy, while Monroe invests the comedy with
dramatic weight and feeling. Her first scene captures her sitting in a window,
looking out towards the street with a lost, longing look in her eyes. As she
does in every scene, when her eyes roll and dart to the corners of her eye like
a caged animal’s, Cherie is seeking escape. In only a few moments her manager
promptly manhandles her away from the window and towards her tattered dressing
room, calling her an “ignorant hillbilly.” “Well, ain’t you,” her friend asks.
Indeed, she “communicates continents of basic ignorance in each gap of the
vowels” of her dumb southern drawl, but she is, like Marilyn, on a quest to better
herself and transcend the limitations of her condition (Mailer 153). Cherie—“it’s
French; it means loved one,” she explains—is “trying to be somebody”; she plans
to go to Hollywood and get discovered, screen tested, and “treated with a
little respect.” She has direction. She shows her friend just how straight it
is on her marked map. She’s tired of hustling for drinks and singing in saloons
and wants to be a “chanteuse like Hildegard.”
Her
singing and dancing are mediocre at best, and Marilyn’s makeup is chalk-white,
almost clownish, to reflect that she sings until the bars close and lives on a
diet of coffee and aspirin, but to Bo she’s an angel. Like the audience, he
sees the sweetness and kindness in her, hidden deep below the surface. When he
takes her out of the saloon after teaching every customer some respect, she is
as honest and straightforward as a child, telling him she though he was a
hooligan, “but then, when I realized you were doing it for me I was attracted
to you… I still am. Course it’s only what you might call a physical
attraction.” For all her professional ambition, Cherie’s personal life, like
Marilyn’s—or Norma Jeane’s—is a mess. The character has been going out with
boys since she was twelve, and almost got married at fourteen. Norma Jeane
became a sex object as soon as she was old enough to be considered one and got
married off at sixteen to escape the orphanage when her foster parents couldn’t
care for her any longer. “The truth was that with all my lipstick and mascara
and precocious curves I was as unresponsive as a fossil,” the actress said; “I
used to lie awake at night wondering why the boys came after me” (Mailer 44).
Cherie, too, fails to understand what men see in her other than her looks and
begins to doubt that she will ever find love.
In
the touching scene on the bus after she has been “abducted—you know,
kidnapped,” it is another woman she opens up to. As in her life and in most of
the movies she’s made, it is women who she relates to on an intellectual and
emotional basis, not men. “I want a guy I can look up to and admire,” Cherie
says, “but I don’t want him to browbeat me. I want a guy who’ll be sweet with
me, but I don’t want him to baby me either. I just got a feeling whoever I
marry has some real regard for me,
aside from all that loving stuff.” What Cherie is searching for is a man who understands
and accepts her for who she is beneath the façade.
In
Marilyn’s last film, Huston’s The Misfits,
audiences got yet another glimpse behind Marilyn’s façade. Again, our first
view of her is framed by a window, this time with a lace curtain fluttering in
the foreground; the curtain will be lifted and her true self revealed in the
course of the next two hours. Her character, Roslyn Taber, is an idealist and a
romantic thrown into a world of disillusionment and disenchantment. “Dear girl,
you gotta stop thinking you can change things,” she is told in various ways
throughout the film, but her optimism, her energy and purity will not let her
sit by and witness injustice. Although most of the lines in the film belong to
the impressive trio of male co-stars— Montgomery Clift, Eli Wallach, and Clark Gable
in his last film—her performance is superb. As the woman all three fall in love
with, Roslyn becomes a quintessential Marilyn character, “the wolfbait, the
eye-stopper… [who] gave satisfaction and demanded nothing in return” (Haskell
254). None of the men are worthy of her; they are weak or damaged anachronisms,
unfinished just like Guido’s (Wallach) house in the country, failed fathers,
husbands, and sons, modern cowboys trying to hold on to something that doesn’t
exist anymore.
Roslyn
has yet to be jaded or damaged; her innocence is her most appealing asset,
although it, too, shows signs of wear by the end of the film. The parallels
between Roslyn and Marilyn’s life are worth mentioning. Neither girl finished
high school, both were married young, neither had mothers growing up, both loved
animals with the gentle abandon of a child, and both, through sheer will power
and irrepressible need to care for others, made their surroundings better and
brighter. “How come you got such trust in your eyes, like you were just born,’
Perce (Clift) asks Roslyn in The Misfits,
while Guido tells her, “Knowing things don’t matter much; you got something a
lot more important—you care. Whatever happens to anybody happens to you… If it
wasn’t for all the nervous people in the world we’d all still be eating each
other.” She completes each of their meaningless lives in a way, much in the
same manner she adds a step to Guido’s porch or reorganizes the house to let
the light in. “You come in, a stranger out of nowhere,” he tells her, “and for
the first time it all lights up… You have a gift for life, Roslyn. The rest of
us are just looking for a place to hide and watch it all go by.”
But
there is a deep sadness hidden behind Roslyn’s happy and youthful demeanor,
just as there was behind Marilyn’s. The actress and the character make others
happy, but not themselves. In the final, excruciating scenes of the film, when
the camera crosscuts between the horses getting tied down in horrifying images
of entrapment, confusion, and violence and Roslyn’s distraught face, we begin
to understand it is not just the horses getting broken, but her spirit as well,
because you can’t live in an environment of violence and injustice without
being tainted by it. “We start out doing something meaning no harm, something
that’s naturally in us to do, but somewhere along the line it gets changed
around into something bad,” Gay (Gable) concludes. “Like dancing in a
nightclub—you started out just wanting to dance, didn’t you? But little by
little it turns out that people ain’t interested in how good you danced,
they’re gawking at you with something entirely different in their minds, and
they turn it sour, don’t they?”
The
same can be said about Marilyn Monroe’s career in Hollywood. She started out
wanting to be an actress, but somewhere along the line it turned out people
weren’t interested in her talent but her looks, and they turned it sour. “Big
breasts, big ass, big deal,” she complained; “can’t I be anything else?”
(Steinem 76). Judging by her work and her lasting appeal, she was so much more.
She is remembered for her roles as a
dumb buxom blonde, but that is not why
she is remembered. No one with as much enduring power could have been just
that. “She belonged to the occult church of the film, and the last covens of
Hollywood. She might be as modest in her voice as the girl next door, but she
was nonetheless larger than life up on the screen.… Yet she was more. She was a
presence. She was ambiguous. She was an angel of sex, and the angel was in her
detachment” (Mailer 16). She was a contradiction in terms, an innocent sexpot,
a smart ditz, a vulnerable, virgin-like vamp. There were things in her people
were drawn by and identified with that went way beyond her star image as a sexy
seductress—her radiance, her innocence and childlike naïveté at once so shy and
so vibrant. People might be attracted by Marilyn, but it is Norma Jeane they
remember; it is the little girl beneath the mask that sets Monroe apart. “The
times being what they were, if she hadn’t existed we would have had to invent
her, and we did, in a way” (Haskell 255).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Works Cited
Buskin,
Richard. The Films of Marilyn Monroe.
Publications International, Ltd., 1992.
Haskell,
Molly. Form Reverence to Rape: The
Treatment of Women in the Movies. 2nd Ed.
Chicago
and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1987
Mailer,
Norman. Marilyn. New York: Gorsset
& Dunlap, 1973.
Steinem,
Gloria. Marilyn. New York: Henry Holt
and Company, 1986.
Wow this was absolutely amazing to read! Your in depth analysis of the talent and ever lasting appeal of Marilyn is spectacular and incredibly well written! Just when I think that I've learned as much as there is to know about Marilyn, you prove me wrong. This article makes me think so much more about her innate abilities and radiance because of the context which you give and the explanation of her finely honed craft as an actress. You give us as readers so much to think about. The way you analyze her films is superb. Thank you so much for this it was great!
ReplyDelete