About
halfway through the brilliant One Flew
Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, director Milos Foreman presents us with an image
whose delicate paradox underlines the dichotomies of themes that govern the
film. In a still, lengthy, almost monochrome closeup, a squirrel daringly but
carefully walks across a chain link fence. In this one moment the ideas behind
the movie and its source material, Ken Kesey’s novel of the same name,
crystallize: nature against the machine, freedom versus imprisonment, inside
and outside. The small animal stops on the fence and looks towards the other
side. Like McMurphy, it sticks out because of its incongruity and, also like
the main character, is too small a force, no matter how powerful, to leave its
mark on the establishment.
Cuckoo’s Nest, both film and
book, captures McMurphy’s struggle against authority, the heartrending
victories of a classic outsider, a free spirit in a closed system, and his
eventual, tragic descent. But while the novel is a celebration of how one man,
making a near-spiritual sacrifice, can make a difference, awakening from their
drugged lethargy an entire community of the defeated, the movie presents us
with his ultimate failure. Judging the film as a separate entity from the
novel, it is an emotionally compelling masterpiece, but, after having read the
source material, it’s clear a lot is lost in translation from page to screen.
***This is a comparative analysis of Foreman's film and Kesey's novel, and it contains spoilers.
***This is a comparative analysis of Foreman's film and Kesey's novel, and it contains spoilers.
Enter
R.P. McMurphy, a loud, irreverent, fast-talking, life-loving rebel in the
outlaw attire of jeans and a starkly contrasting black leather motorcycle
jacket, and we know things are going to get shaken up a little. Dancing his way
out of handcuffs and into every patient’s reticent good graces, McMurphy
becomes their hero, their savior, and their martyr, bucking the system and
refusing to surrender himself to it. Over the next few weeks, the character
evolves into a larger-than-life presence, “the logger (…), the brawling
Irishman, the cowboy out of the TV set walking down the middle of the street to
meet a dare”; he is exceptional for no other reason than being what he is, his
own self, his own man, uninfluenced and unshaped by the forces of the Combine
(pg. 171).
In
the novel, he teaches the other patients how to be themselves as well, how to
reclaim their manhood and their humanity from under the domineering power of
Nurse Ratched, a woman who has subsumed sexuality and humanity into duty and
righteousness, who has taken every characteristic of identity and individuality
and twisted it into a grotesquely warped vision of conformity and machine-like
efficiency. As seen through the Chief’s eyes, Kesey’s prose surges, ebbs, and
flows in an unforgettable, distinctive voice full of lyricism and feeling. The
film, told from an objective, third-person perspective distances us from the
characters. They come wondrously alive under Foreman’s direction, each superbly
cast, but each a bit less than fully-formed individuals, closer to the
categories, types, and labels of the hospital. Their insanity, more than their
humanity, is evident in every scene, and the marvelous chaos that ensues
regularly throughout the film is refreshingly uncontained.
Of
course, because of time limitations, many of the events of the novel are left
out or compounded, giving the film a more frenzied, frantic feel as one
incident gives way to the next and the men start coming out of McMurphy’s
shadow and finally casting their own by realizing they have unexplored depths
of stature and weight and meaning, even control over their own minds, bodies,
and fates. Beholding McMurphy work his magic is a pleasure and a privilege, and
seeing Nicholson wheel and deal—both metaphorically quite literally —is one
advantage Foreman’s Cuckoo holds
firmly over Kesey’s. He laughs, he screams, he wise-cracks and sings, and
through charisma, gall, and sheer will power stages something of a revolution,
a reclaiming of rights for the patients. Even their outfits change from white
to a lively, natural green.
McMurphy
convinces the men they can be men again, even if they’re just staring at their
reflections in a blank screen when the World Series is on. The sport they do
engage in, basketball—in scenes added to Kesey’s writing by the script—is a
manifestation of a corporal ideal of masculinity in physical fitness, strength,
and ruggedness which reverses the weakening of masculine traits under the
matriarchal dominance of the ward. Basketball allows them to be aggressive,
self-reliant, and disciplined on their own terms, and, winning with Chief’s
invaluable help over the orderlies, they reassert their power and presence.
What makes them men is not getting drunk and getting laid, as in the party
scene, but the ability to do so, to let loose and laugh and enjoy themselves in
a spirit of tightly-knit camaraderie.
The
fishing trip, a key turning point in both works, is, however, less effective in
the film. In the novel, the patients use their condition as a source of power for
the first time and are delighted by the result when the gas station attendees
succumb. In the film they are not allowed to be themselves, instead pretending
they are doctors from the hospital. The scene in which McMurphy introduces them
as such to the dock worker—all but poor Harding, who remains “Mr.”—and a series
of closeups comically plays off their unprofessional appearance represents a
moment of pure joy and relief in a film that uses humor to underscore poignant,
painful truths. However effective scenes like these are on their own terms,
they lose some of the meaning behind Kesey’s work.
Other
important scenes also seem less meaningful in the movie. When McMurphy offers
the Chief some chewing gum and he thanks him, the first word he has spoken to
anyone in years, it’s wonderful to see Nicholson’s face and laugh with the
Chief at the simplicity and quiet grace of the moment. But reading the book we
better understand the interaction is more than a funny surprise—and it is a
surprise to the viewers when he talks in a way it cannot be to the readers. In
Kesey’s novel, the Chief is not thanking McMurphy for the gum, but expressing
an uncontrollable need to show gratitude for everything else he’s done for the
men.
At
the same time, however, there are scenes of haunting beauty and poetry that
Foreman and writers Lawrence Hauben and Bo Goldman come up with for the film,
like the extended closeup of McMurphy’s face before that last fateful morning.
The camera lingers on his ambiguous, obscure expression; lost in thought, a small
smile creeps up on his lips, but it seems more sad than joyful. What is he
thinking? Does he decide to stay and forego his escape? Is he giving up or
manning up for another round with Ratched? We don’t know if he’s hopeful or
resigned.
Perhaps
the movie audience’s biggest loss is not getting to know the Chief’s story; his
importance in the book makes his final liberating act more forceful. In the
film no other patients see McMurphy after the operation, whereas in the novel
they tell themselves it’s not actually him. When the Chief takes his
life—what’s left of it—it is shocking in both movie and book, but it is more
understandable in Kesey’s novel. After his escape, the two works diverge in the
last scene of the film enough to create opposite meanings.
In
the book McMurphy’s sacrifice is not in vain: one by one the men sign out of
the ward, breaking free of Ratched’s control, which has been decimated in one
fell swoop when McMurphy attacked her, ripping her clothes off in the process,
asserting his physical, sexual power over her and making it impossible for her
to hide her humanity, vulnerability, and femininity behind the mask of a
starched uniform. In the film everything goes back to the way it was before, as
if McMurphy had not existed at all. Even before he is brought back down from
Disturbed the ward looks like it did in the first scene. Harding deals
blackjack as the incessant, lifeless music plays on and on, and the men line up
for their medication, which Nurse Ratched, all patched up and better,
administers through an opening in her spick and span new glass window. So
whereas Kesey’s hero succeeds, leading the patients on to better lives, his
sacrifice is inconsequential in the movie.
I read through your article almost immediately after seeing the film. Very well written, you explained the meaning behind both versions, allowing me to take a better understanding away from it. I am now looking forward to reading the book, thank you!
ReplyDeleteI agree, very well written.
ReplyDeleteI disagree that the ending is not optimistic. At the end of the movie, we see that even in McMurphy's absence, his spirit lives on in the hearts of the patients. They still gamble, and make legends about him. McMurphy, knowing the extent of the cruelty Ratched will show you, should you not follow her orders, still strangles her. He knew he would be tortured by the staff for that, and does it anyway. And I disagree, that McMurphy gave up hope. He smile and free spirit lasts throughout the movie. The electric shocks only "charged" him up as McMurphy says. No amount of electric shocks in the world would bring him down.
ReplyDelete